Letter from Charles S. Peirce to Julius E. Hilgard
(Brühl, Prusia, 01.08.1883)



 
Spanish translation & annotations

 


Care Morton, Rose & Co.
Bartholomew Lane E. C. London
Brühl, Prussia
August 1, 1883

J. E. Hilgard
Superintendent
U. S. Coast & Geodetic Survey
Washington D. C.

Dear Sir,

I have the honor to render my report for July. Although I have received no word of either my May or my June report having reached you.

I have already fully explained the circumstances of the comparisons upon which I was still engaged at the end of June, i. e. between the Imperial Standard Nº 1 and the Low Moor Wrought Iron Yard Nº 57, belonging to the U.S. These comparisons were finished on July 3, 1883. They consist of 48 sets; 24 by Chaney, 24 by Peirce. Each set contains 10

 

 

individual comparisons. The first 12 sets by each observer were at temperatures below 62º, the last 12 at temperatures above 62º. In the first 6 of each of these series of 12 sets Nº 57 was next the observer, in the last 6, Nº 2 was near the observer. The comparisons appear to be moderately satisfactory.

On July 4 and 5, the thermometers were intercompared and compared with three standards, two of which then had their zeros determined by me.

On July 5, the values of the screw-revolutions of the micrometers were determined by both observers independently by means of the standard inches.

July 6-12. Comparisons of Yards Nº 57 and 58. Twelve sets by Peirce, six sets by Chaney. Bars were transposed. All the temperatures between 66º and 68º. Peirce’s results concordant but differ markedly from Chaney’s owing to peculiarity in ruling of one line.

July 13. Redetermination of the values of the screw revolutions by both observers independently.

 

Operations at the Kew Observatory were commenced July 2nd and lasted until July 28th. The Hardy's noddy constructed by Breguet was used, while the Repsold pendulum mounted as in my experiments of July, 1876, was in oscillation. The result showed that the oscillation of the stone pier, walls, and vaulting was sufficient to cause an error of 4 microns in the length of the second's pendulum.

During this time, I also made a new mathematical discussion of the motion of the noddy, and developed the method of using the instrument. I have little doubt it will come into practical use, as it is most satisfactory. I have written a paper on the subject for presentation at Rome by General Cutts or Mr. Schott. I hope they will do justice to my two papers, which appear to me to be the most important I have yet produced on the subject of pendulums.

I left England July 25th and proceeded to Brussels where I was kept in the house

 

for two days by the storm. I found that owing to the death of Col. Adam, all prosecution of the scientific departments of the Survey had been arrested. I however was glad to learn the details of their methods of making their maps. I also visited the observatory, but was unable to do anything about Metrology because the members of the commission were all away.

From Brussels, I went to Liége, in order to see Wéry establishment; with which I was not much impressed. I then went to Cologne, and being pressed by Chaney to finish the reductions of our work, I remain here in the neighborhood to do up a little necessary office work.

In yours of the 29th April you say that you will on the 30th send me the address of a party in Paris from whom I am to order instruments and apparatus. This address never reached me; but in my case I could not have dealt with Breguet

 

in that way. His bill amounts to 460fr.35. I have sent him vouchers to sign and transmit to Morgan for payment. Here will be a supplementary bill for alterations.

For my work in Richmond, I found myself in need of some kind of chronograph. I went to Casella for one of his marking watches, but found he had given up making them. He recommended me to go to Dent, which I did and paid 6 pounds for a timing watch. As well as I can understand from the brief explanation in yours of April 29, you only want vouchers in England signed by Casella. I therefore went back to him, but owing to Mr. Casella being dangerously ill or for some reason I did not see him. I therefore append Dent's bill to my voucher. I got a thermometer of Negretti & Zambra which I trust I may not be obliged to pay for personally.

I did not take either the yard or the kilo from London. The reason I did not take the yard was that both Chaney and I think that further comparisons are desiderable. The reason I did not take the kilo was that Dr. Brock talked so much of the necessity of having a special box made

 

for it, that I thought it would be better to run over from Paris to London and bring it back, hoping that I should meantime receive an answer from you to my communication on this subject. I do not hear from you and fear you must be ill, as I cannot suppose that all my letters have failed to reach you; and I do not see how you can think them unimportant. For this reason, I make this month’s report as brief as possible.

I have received a second letter, not having received any first, from a firm in Baltimore (Seemüller) with whom I had some things stored; from this letter I infer that the things have been burnt, and there must have been some Coast Survey property destroyed. I cannot now say precisely what there was, but it was not much.

It is plain my absence will somewhat overrun the time allowed for the work. But you will see that I have no lost any time that could be saved, not one day. Chaney’s being in Paris prevented my doing anything

 

in London till his return, and I could do nothing in Richmond till Breguet finished the Noody. I worked as hard as I could in England, and came away as soon as the work was done. I lost two days in Brussels, but it rained so I couldn’t very well make calls. Here, my halt seems quite necessary to enable me to get off some office work. I expect to take either the last steamer of August or the first of September from Havre for New York.

Yours very respectfully,

C. S. Peirce
Asst.



Transcription by Max Fisch, revised by Sara Barrena (2019)
Una de las ventajas de los textos en formato electrónico respecto de los textos impresos es que pueden corregirse con gran facilidad mediante la colaboración activa de los lectores que adviertan erratas, errores o simplemente mejores transcripciones. En este sentido agradeceríamos que se enviaran todas las sugerencias y correcciones a sbarrena@unav.es
Proyecto de investigación "The Cosmopolitan Peirce: Cartas de C. S. Peirce en su quinto viaje europeo (2 de mayo-18 de septiembre 1883)"

Fecha del documento: 1 de octubre 2019
Última actualización: 13 de enero 2021

 

[Main Page]