Report from Henry Farquhar to superintendent Thorn
(Washington, 30.07.1885)



 
Spanish translation & annotations

 

 

U. S. Coast and Geodetic Survey Office

 

Washington, 30 July, 1885

I was yesterday directed by Mr. Thorn, the present Supt. of this Survey, to prepare statement of facts within my personal knowledge [-ring?] on the expenditures incurred for the Survey by Assist. Chas S. Peirce & covering the following points:

1. "A number of trips Mr. Peirce has made to Europe; that of 1875 & arrangements for travel's expenses of Assistant,"

2. "Proportional part of the year devoted to active operations with pendulum."

3. "Degree of attention given by Mr. Peirce to the work which in operation, & proportion of work left to subordinates (until 1880 when Mr. Farquhar ceased to assist Mr. Peirce in this function).

 

4. "Apparatus constructed for or purchased by the party — care taken of it & use made of it."

5. "Present condition and whereabouts of the original data or record of observations & also of results."

6. "By whom the observations have been worked up (on computer) & prepared for publication."

In compliance wherewith I have the honor to submit the following:

1. I have no personal knowledge in regard to the first of these trips, made in connection with the total solar eclipse of year 1870. For Mr. Peirce's observations on the Eclipse, see the Report

 

of his father (then Supt.) for 1870 [page 12]. The following paragraph is from the Report of the same Supt. for 1871, page 10.

"With a view of selecting localities where atmospherical [sic: it should be astronomical] conditions as well as those of the weather [sic] might be expected to be favorable for observing, Mr. Chas. S. Peirce proceeded to Europe in advance under my direction, and after visiting Italy, Spain, & European Turkey, recommended the occupation of stations in Southern Spain and Italy."

On the second trip, in 1875-76 I accompanied Mr. Peirce & we were out of this country sixteen months. My pay was $78 ($3 per diem) before starting and was reduced to $80 after returning; but during the 15 months when on duty in Europe it was fixed at $100 a month. I accepted this

 

arrangement with the understanding that the nominal increase of pay was in reality a provision for the payment of my passage across the Atlantic. My impression is that this device was suggested (or approved) by Supt. Patterson in a letter written about the middle of February 1875, to Mr. Peirce in Cambridge, Mass. The results from this trip are shown in Appendix No. 15 to the Report of the Supt. for 1876 pp. 200- to 344.

Of what was done on the third, fourth, & fifth trips I have no direct knowledge, nor have I found much explanation of them in the Official Reports. I quote as follows:

"While abroad as Delegate to the International Geodetic [...]

[pages 5, and 6 are omitted]

 

"In pursuance of instructions dated April 23, 1883, Mr. Peirce left for Europe in May in order to make for the Coast Survey certain observations necessary for computing the connection of the American & English pendulum work and to obtain some additional pendulum apparatus of special construction. He is still abroad upon this duty at the date of closing this report" (Supt. Hilgard's Report for 1883, p. 37).

The Report for 1884 has not yet appeared. I can find no mention of any results from the last three trips in any publication by this Survey (further than [il.] referred to) and I do find, in the last appendix to the last published Report of the Survey (for 1883 pp. 476-483- 489) the admission that Mr. Peirce's adopted standard of length is erroneous, its correction [seems?] still "provisional " (correction

 

deduced in the Note —pp. 462-3 of the 1881 Report). The part taken by Mr. Peirce in the deliberations of the International Geodetic Association is doubtless set forth in the proceedings of that Association, which I have not examined.

2. Beginning with 1875 and enduring with 1884: Mr. Peirce landed in England April 13 and the only observations with the pendulum were made Sept. 2 to 17 at Geneva. From June 17 to July 4. [il.], comparisons of lengths of standards where made at Berlin. In 1876, the active work (of which results have been published) at Paris was included between January 22 and Feb. 24, at Berlin, between April 19 & May 2, at Kew, Surrey between June 29 & July 11.

 

In 1877, observations and experiments were continued at intervals from April 8 to June 17. Also from Sept. 25 to Oct. 5 and Nov. 30 to Dec. 23. In 1878 from April 24 to May 11. Mr. Peirce's headquarters during these two years were in New York City. In 1879 observations continued from January 2 to March 3 at Alleghany, & from Aug. 14 to Sept. 25 at Ebensburg, PA. In 880, March 3 to June 9, at York, PA.

These dates are taken from the Reports for 1876 & 1883. After June 1880, my information is obtained exclusively from record-books stored in Room 82 of this Office. From these it appears that a few experimental observations of swings were made in June 1881 at Washington, a series at Baltimore July 31 to Aug. 11 of that year, and

 

one at Cambridge, Mass. in September. In 1882, some observations were made in May at Washington, in June at Baltimore, in July at Washington (a few noted as "no with working ? up") in Aug. at Hoboken, N. Y. in Sept at Montreal, P. Q., and Albany, N. Y. n 1883, Feb & March in Washington. In 1884 Feb & March & again in July Washington; Aug, Fort Monroe, Va.

This is a bare answer to the question, not allowing for time spent in necessary preparations, in reducing observations, in experiments the [?] results of which are unpublished, as an outside work of any kind.

 

3. All of the above stated observations made in 1875 & 1876 were by Mr. Peirce [îl: minuciosamente?], as where those in May & June 1877. During the 3 years following, the very ones made by him were those for "flexure" pp. 375-388 of Report from 1881. One nights work nov. 30, 1877 & two or three in Feb. 1879. The remainden observations by myself, according to instructions previously given by him. [il.]  is made of this in Mr. Peirce's Report of the [il.] in Sept to Dec 1877, and in 1880; but none at all in the intermediate years. Indeed the explicitness with which the report here states who

 

made the observations for [il.] seems distinctly to suggest that no such acknowledgement in the case of observations with the Pendulum is called for.

For a complete answer to this question, a consideration of the amount of time during which Mr. Peirce was absent from his posts, his traveling expenses paid by the Coast Survey, with a fair judgment as to how far these costly absences advanced & how far retarded the work of his party, is evidently requisite that I am not able to give.

 

4. This point is one that is certainly important enough for a fair & full treatment, but it cannot be covered by any evidence at present at my command. From the few facts of which I can imagine a specific statement, no just conclusion can be drawn. If a list of the instruments & books purchased by the Survey for the use of Mr. Peirce up to July 1880 with their prices can be obtained from the Disbursing Office, I can [il.] about I know of the use to which each was applied and in what condition

 

it is now to be found, so as to aid in the intelligent comparison of outlay and outcome in each case. Without the necessary list & figures I can only record my personal impression one of prodigal extravagance.

An inspection of the room last occupied by him at this office Nº 82 (usually locked) will speak more to the purpose that I can with voice and pen.

5. The Archives of this Survey do not, I believe, contain the records of any part of Mr. Peirce's work from the beginning of his pendulum operations in

 

1873 to the present time; he having retained wherein in his own possession & holdings wherein now in Room 82. [il.] head (2) I have known something of that material of the yet unpublished work. To that list should be added the observations at Massachussetts stations in 1873-74, recorded in nearly 50 Ms. vols. from which no useful result has yet been derived.

6. With the exception of the work of 1875-80 the pendulum observations have, as just shown, not been prepared for publication. I was employed for several months last Winter on the work of

 

preparation of the results from three additional series of observations very nearly ready; the lacking essentials being in one case a neglected thermometer comparison and in another a failure  to determine the flexure of the pendulum stand.

I cannot close this necessarily partial statement without expressing the earnest hope that no use may be made of it to obstruct the work of Comparative Gravity determinations, which much rather be extended and need more thorough; calling attention to the account of the

 

present condition & value of this research given in Appendix 22 to the Report of the Superintendent for 1882 (pp. 503-516).

(Signed) Henry Farquhar

 


Transcription by Sara Barrena (2015)
Una de las ventajas de los textos en formato electrónico respecto de los textos impresos es que pueden corregirse con gran facilidad mediante la colaboración activa de los lectores que adviertan erratas, errores o simplemente mejores transcripciones. En este sentido agradeceríamos que se enviaran todas las sugerencias y correcciones a sbarrena@unav.es
Proyecto de investigación "Charles S. Peirce en Europa (1875-76): comunidad científica y correspondencia" (PIUNA 2012-15)

Fecha del documento: 1 de junio 2015
Última actualización: 22 de agosto 2022
[Main Page]